Downfall - "Droppin bombs since '04"

  • home
  • forums
  • calendar
  • gallery
  • handbook
  • raid hub
  • epgp
Home › Blogs › Ewiges's blog

Wal-Mart, time to boycott?

Ewiges's picture

Ewiges — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 13:17

Everyone loves Wally World! Wal-Mart is the only place in the world where you can walk in, and walk out with whatever you wanted at the cheapest price around. At Wal-Mart I can go back to school shopping, grocery shopping, buy some dickies shorts, and pick up a case of beer and anything I need for my truck all in one shopping trip. Not only that, but know I didn't over spend.

Over the years Wal-Mart have been putting thousands of businesses out on the street. This includes everything from ma and pop stores to national retail chains. Now Wal-Mart has declared they will be starting 'Project Impact' in which they will be aiming at closing Rite-Aid, K-Mart, and Toys-R-Us. Has Wally World gone to far?

As a consumer, we have to come to a decision of whether we want a choice, or one simple place that makes all your dreams come true. When is it time to boycott Wal-Mart? Is it bad what they are doing? What do you guys think? Will Wally-World be the new circle K, one on every corner... but no where else to go to?

  • Other
  • Ewiges's blog
Shihli's picture

But Walmart does, on average,

Shihli — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 14:30

But Walmart does, on average, offer a base wage that is twice the minimum wage of the states it's in.

Again, not saying they're godly - 'cos they aren't and many news reports will echo that - but again, demonizing Walmart because they're doing something that any business does is just ... well, frivolous.

starstalker's picture

The average hourly pay,

starstalker — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 15:55

The average hourly pay, nationwide, for a walmart worker in 2005 (lastest I could find) was $9.68, translating to yearly wages of just over $17,000 (based again on average hours worked by a walmart worker). In 2005 the national minimum wage was $5.15. Not quite twice. Close, but considering average price of rent nationwide in 2007 (closest year I could find) was a smidge over $1000/mo, it hardly makes it living.

To top it off, walmart employees, if they managed to actually qualify for health care under walmarts restrictive standards, want to join the plan, will pay anywhere from 5% to 25% (based on coverage and deductibles) of their paychecks. Between housing and health care eating up their checks, its no wonder the estimated cost of federal subsidies to *just* walmart employees was 2.5 billion (with a b!) dollars a year.

 

Dufe's picture

I think I'd worry about the

Dufe — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 15:55

I think I'd worry about the millions of workers making minimum wage before I got up in arms about Wal-Mart paying nearly twice that.  Especially since the majority of minimum wage workers don't get the aforementioned benefits either.

Also, according to the average wage and health care stats you listed, the 75% of $9.68 left after paying for health care is $7.26, still well above the minimum wage.

As far as the cost of rent, your numbers may not present an accurate picture.  If the $1000/mo is the average of the entire set of rentals in the nation, then applying that figure to the Wal-Mart Employee's cost of living assumes that the rentals made by Wal-Mart employees are equally distributed across this same full set of all rentals in the nation, which is VERY unlikely, though I couldn't confirm that without research.

No one is saying that they have a great standard of living, only that they are far from the bottom and not so far displaced from other retail workers as many people seem to think.

starstalker's picture

I see your point about the

starstalker — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 16:39

I see your point about the accuracy of rentals in regards to walmart employees, but it would be very hard to come up with a more average set of numbers (given walmarts status as the largest private employer in the world). If walmarts workforce couldn't be averaged out with a given degree of accuracy, I don't know of any other corporation that could. Yes, there will be regional anomalies, but I don't see how that would be different than any other chain serving the same regions.

Dufe's picture

It's not the regional

Dufe — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 16:54

It's not the regional differences I worry about, it's the "price brackets," if you will.  If 90% of Wal-Mart workers rent living spaces in the lowest 10% of rental prices, then the they aren't, on average, paying $1000/mo.

However, the inaccuracy resulting from this issue would be further compounded by the diffences in the price distributions in each market, e.g. different variance, skew, etc., some markets are likely not normally distributed at all.  If you took the price at like -2.7σ from the mean for each market, and found the average of that number accross all the markets nationally, I'd bet you'd be much closer to what the average Wal-Mart employee pays for housing.

Ewiges's picture

Here is the article I was

Ewiges — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 18:32

Here is the article I was basing my information off of: http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1920698,00.html?xid=fee...

Its a time article with CNN partnership so it can't be completely BS right?

Dufe's picture

There is not a single line in

Dufe — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 18:58

There is not a single line in there that directly shows that "project impact" lists killing K-Mart or Toys 'R Us off is one of the stated goals.  All of that came from quotes from this "Burt Flickinger," who is listed as a "Wal-Mart watchdog."  I'm sure his comments are unbiased statements of fact regarding Wal-Marts strategic planning.  Reading comprehension guys, sheesh.  Anything from any news source can be (and probably is) biased, you have to learn how to recognize it.

Ewiges's picture

Dufe, taking obvious

Ewiges — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 19:14

Dufe, taking obvious information and making it offensive.

Anyways, yeah. Wal*Mart does not say directly they are doing X X or X beyond the simple, "cleaner stores". And I believe every news source is biased, why wouldn't it be? The idea is you take information from the most reliable source... reliable, opposite on unreliable. Flickinger words has a shit load more credibility than my words, so instead of me saying something I quote him. He is my source. What else can you ask for?

Dufe's picture

What else can I ask for? How

Dufe — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 19:39

What else can I ask for? How about quotes from somebody who isn't admittedly in open opposition to (or support of) Walmart? Biased = unreliable.

Ewiges's picture

So I've been pricing Wii's

Ewiges — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 18:40

So I've been pricing Wii's (hinx my other thread) and I just noticed something about Wal*Mart.

So the price of a nintendo Wii anywhere you go is $250 (yes a rounded to the dollar). This includes the console, 1 remote, and the Wii sports. The price for a nintendo Wii is set by nintendo, stores can not undercut eachother.

What I've noticed: For $250 Wal*Mart has the basic Wii package (Explained above) but also your choice of any Wii game for free. I could not find this deal at any other major retailors website. I checked Target, BestBuy, CircuitCity, and Gamestop.

This is an example of how Wal*Mart will take a hit themselves to get you, the consumer, into the store.

Shihli's picture

So taking a purposeful loss

Shihli — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 20:14

So taking a purposeful loss (as you put it) to try and encourage people to shop at your store is evil how?

Ewiges's picture

1. I am not biased, just read

Ewiges — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 20:54

1. I'm not set on a boycott for Wally World, just read the OP.

2. Not completely sure that a Wal*Mart watcher is completely against Wally World but rather a statistical tracker... if that makes sense.

3. Shihli, I was just saying that Wal*Mart has the power to make sacrifices that other companies can't. Like how rocketfeller would sell oil below value so other companies couldn't compete, then buy them out when they had no other option.

Lastly, not everything is Wal*Mart's fault. I'm boycotting Target because of what they did to my family, which actually makes me shop at Wal*Mart more. Target indirectly made my mom unemployed and caused her to lose around $20,000 in savings.

Dufe's picture

Anytime you see "X watch

Dufe — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 21:52

Anytime you see "X watch group," X watcher," or "X watch-dog,"  it really means group/person opposed to X. the term is used VERY frequently in all levels of politics/activism these days.  (See also Nuclear Watchdogs, etc)

I didn't mean to imply that you are biased, but rather the Fluckinger fellow.

Dufe's picture

You're right, no other store

Dufe — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 18:44

You're right, no other store in the world ever has a sale or promotion to get more customers in the door.

Shihli's picture

Star, you and I are spoiled

Shihli — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 15:55

Star, you and I are spoiled in that we don't have to *earn* minimum wage to get by.

Yes, just minimum wage is not enough to support a family, but it's all many people can get.  Walmart offers more than that, so why demonize it when it's offering better wages than many places?

For example - I earn more on unemployment (25% of my typical income) than Allikat does in her job, standard.

Aidin's picture

I know a young lady 1/2 my

Aidin — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 14:36

I know a young lady 1/2 my age who just got a job at Wal-Mart...and she makes TWO dollars less an hour then I do...and I make an OK living...not great, bearly decent.  But 2$ less ...TWO...

if anyone's interested in an

Kwondre — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 13:49

if anyone's interested in an organized, semi-sophisticated discussion about Wal-Mart (it's kind of my career to know about Wal-Mart), we can set up a time and vent channel =)

I will say this though, there are two sides (with legitimate points) to this argument - as is often the case with many arguments in the universe....

Grasen's picture

while i love this idea,   i

Grasen — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 13:47

while i love this idea,   i cant afford to boycott walmart lol

Aidin's picture

Project Impact says they will

Aidin — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 13:29

Project Impact says they will update the stores...and lower prices...

Lower prices?? You have my business...period.

garreth's picture

I think that's the root of

garreth — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 13:32

I think that's the root of the problem, Aidn ;)

Aidin's picture

Well until I can afford to

Aidin — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 14:07

Well until I can afford to shop where I want...I will remain the root of the "problem"  ...us poor folks need all the help we can get.

Or maybe we can chase the root back even further then me being broke and shopping at Wal-Mart. Say to my government that says "sorry we can't help you feed your kids, you make too much money."  but gives Sally the dope whore with 6 kids from 6 unknown fathers a place to live, food to feed her family, child care, and even out right CASH to spend on her crack habit.

garreth's picture

Though documentaries are

garreth — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 13:26

Though documentaries are hardly unbiased, this was good: 

http://www.netflix.com/Movie/Wal-Mart_The_High_Cost_of_Low_Price/7004080...

You can instant watch it, I recommend everyone check it out. The Ayn Randian side of me is at odds with the bleeding heart side of me over Wal Mart.

Karli's picture

Garreth has a heart?  Lies.

Karli — Wed, 09/09/2009 - 16:41

Garreth has a heart?  Lies.

  • « first
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2

Random image

Knoppix in Bora Bora

Navigation

  • Content
  • Raid Parses
  • The Downfall Handbook
  • User list
  • Polls
  • Groups
  • Popular content

Who's new

  • Babyconan
  • Grantlius
  • Ecology
  • fumabomb
  • firstslacker

Latest image

PMS Logo for Legion

Archives

  • September 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (5)
  • July 2016 (8)
  • June 2016 (2)
  • May 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (3)
  • February 2016 (2)
  • January 2016 (5)
  • August 2015 (1)
  • May 2015 (3)

Recent comments

  • App closed with extreme
    7 hours 17 min ago
  • Guild App closed at his
    4 weeks 1 day ago
  • Once we get the new site,
    7 weeks 1 day ago
  • Is the time frame posted in server time?
    7 weeks 2 days ago
  • Awesome. Thanks. Once I
    9 weeks 1 day ago
  • I'd be happy to stick around
    9 weeks 1 day ago
  • Possibly
    9 weeks 1 day ago
  • More necro
    10 weeks 2 days ago
  • Story time!
    11 weeks 3 days ago
  • I;ve downladed drop box, if
    13 weeks 17 hours ago

Active forum topics

  • April 1st 2006
  • Nostalarious: "Blizzard wants Vanilla servers"
  • Galaga 13/13 Heroic by Deposing A Tyrant
  • Poker Face Achieves in one night! Glory of Hellfire Raider
  • Glory of The Hellfire Raider
  • Galaga Destroys Heroic Archimonde AOTC 12/13H
  • Galaga takes out Thomas the Train (7/10 H BRF)
more

Recent blog posts

  • So I guess this is the end...
  • Shaedo's Soloing Extravaganza
  • Shaedo UI Extravaganza
  • Big site updates this weekend!
  • This is for all the Hearthstone players out there
  • My First Full Day on Beta
  • State Of <Downfall> 2014
  • Scaron taking a break
  • How Gorgonnash's Connections went
  • Let's Talk about Mythic Raids
more

Poll

What do you think about no flying for an entire expansion?
YES) It makes me feel more immersed in the game lore.
15%
YES) It encourages more PvP! (Please explain how in comments)
5%
YES) I miss riding my ground mounts.
9%
MAYBE) If you make all of my flying mounts able to be ground too.
8%
MAYBE) if ground mounts are sped up to 200% speed (or higher)
26%
NO) I don't have enough time when I'm on to be riding everywhere
7%
NO) I have spent too much time getting various levels of flying to be wasting it.
11%
NO) It encourages more PVP! (please explain in the comments)
0%
NO) I love flying.
19%
Total votes: 74
  • 38comments
  • Older polls

Popular content

All time:

  • Professor Putricide Strategy Page
  • Rotface Strategy Guide
  • Arthas, the Lich King Strategy Page
  • Sindragosa Strategy Page
  • Toravon the Ice Watcher Strategy Guide
  • home
  • forums
  • calendar
  • gallery
  • handbook
  • raid hub
  • epgp

I notice your oeuvre is monochromatic.
This site is proudly powered by Drupal.