I just want to see how many of you can read this.
Anonymous — Fri, 02/20/2009 - 10:22
Cna yuo raed tihs? Olny 55 plepoe out of 100 can.
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt thing is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!
oll inec ufll raeed.
Atakheal — Mon, 04/13/2009 - 15:52oll inec ufll raed.
I can read it with no problems
Alexinaa — Fri, 02/27/2009 - 11:41so add me to the 55% that can. I would suspect people with reading/ learning disabilities such as dyslexia might have some difficulty though.
Back in highschool a teacher
Ewiges — Mon, 04/13/2009 - 15:08Back in highschool a teacher passed this around, except it didn't have the 55% part in it. I think someone added that part and it isn't true. Everyone here figured it out and like aiden said, I've also yet to find someone who couldn't read it.
I can reads it...am I a
Foresight — Mon, 02/23/2009 - 03:40I can reads it...am I a special flower?
This forwarded e-mail stuff,
Derchlon — Sat, 02/21/2009 - 22:51This forwarded e-mail, has been around for at least 3 years. Still just as interesting.
I also dream in color.
Agoney — Sat, 02/21/2009 - 15:06I also dream in color.
Well it's "readable" But
saedo — Sat, 02/21/2009 - 14:08Well it's "readable" But some words did need a bit of thought. You'd have to think of context and naturally think what word should flow with it. If you just cram gibberish with gibberish language, you'll get nothing.
pboerlm iproamtnt taotl tghuhot!!!!
You can prob translate that if you try.
pboerlm iproamtnt taotl
everstar — Sat, 02/21/2009 - 14:24pboerlm iproamtnt taotl tghuhot!!!!
problem important total thought? wtf?!
Yea I just copied random
saedo — Sat, 02/21/2009 - 14:37Yea I just copied random jumbled words from above, basically taking out any context, no proper english sentences. But if they weren't already there, would you have seen the word in em?
not without putting thought
everstar — Sat, 02/21/2009 - 14:58not without putting thought into it
duh!
<3 saedo
As long as the first and last
Katibug — Sat, 02/21/2009 - 10:10As long as the first and last letter of the word are correct, you can put jibberish in for the rest of the letters and the human brain rearranges the letters to decipher the word.
Bet wist if you drat umame
Shihli — Sat, 02/21/2009 - 11:53Bet wist if you drat umame gash fur tippee lacross in barn?
(aka But what if you don't use gibberish for the letters in-between?)
weird
Closer — Sat, 02/21/2009 - 09:03That's pretty weird. I had no trouble at all reading it.
If the study shows that the
Lorb — Sat, 02/21/2009 - 09:43If the study shows that the human mine can read that, did it say why only 55 out of 100 could?
Come to think of it...I don't
Aidin — Sat, 02/21/2009 - 12:32Come to think of it...I don't think I've ever met anyone who can't read it...
Esay Cesehy.
Fjork — Fri, 02/20/2009 - 11:31Esay Cesehy.
I am in the 55 with Aidin.
Olorien — Fri, 02/20/2009 - 11:14I am in the 55 with Aidin. It is amazing what your brain can process and comprehend.
Put me in the 55 who can read
Aidin — Fri, 02/20/2009 - 10:40Put me in the 55 who can read this with zero issue.
Omg was that my typing joke,
Caronte22 — Fri, 02/20/2009 - 21:14Omg was that my typing joke, put me in the top 55